In addition into the primary punishment, the court may additionally impose a fine within the offender. The fine’s amount is on the discretion with the court and is meant to serve as an additional deterrent.
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, it is also a perfectly-proven proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fireplace-arm injury which was fatal on the deceased was caused because of the petitioner but in support of opinion of the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is accessible about the file and mere ipsi dixit of police is not really binding within the Court.
Statutory laws are All those created by legislative bodies, including Congress at both the federal and state levels. While this style of regulation strives to shape our society, furnishing rules and guidelines, it would be impossible for just about any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety days. Should the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she will then approach the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the ninety days for the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we are guided because of the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
Please use 1 username and password set from the options. If it does not work please try the other. Every allows single consumer access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have completed your session in Manupatra.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there could be a person or more judgments supplied (or reported). Only the reason for that decision of your majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could be adopted within an argument.
The issue here is that an accused may possibly say that they meant to injure the sufferer, but they did not plan to get rid of them. In other words, they might claim that thedeath that resulted due to accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor intended.
Typically, only an appeal accepted from the court of final vacation resort will resolve these types of differences and, For numerous reasons, these kinds of appeals tend to be not granted.
acquitted the appellants from each of the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
The scrupulous reader may perhaps have noticed something over: a flaw. Past the first 7 words, the definition focuses to the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The two basic elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of the crime are “
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and likely hazard to local residents. In the end, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, though observing the general pattern supports that electromagnetic fields have unfavorable effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle set out from the 1992 Rio Declaration around the Environment and Progress, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby the lack of full scientific certainty should not be used construction case law being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.